#EpiscopalResurrection #GC78 – Rez D009: Revitalize Congregations – Death Before Resurrection

By Ken Howard

This is the third (or fourth, depending up how you count), in a series of blog posts on the Episcopal Resurrection movement. The first discussed the Memorial to the Church. The second (or second and third) discussed Resolution D005 on Planting Churches. In today’s post, we turn to Resolution D009 – “Revitalization of Congregations.”

Resolution D009 recommends allocating $1 million over the next triennium to a serious effort to support Episcopal congregation begin the process of congregational revitalization, by funding the developing a church-wide congregational revitalization network, including a TEC staff person to guide the development of the network, a cadre of trained church revitalization consultants to assist congregations in the revitalization process, and a revitalization venture fund to underwrite individual revitalization efforts.

Now you’re probably saying to yourselves, “That’s a lot of money.”

Actually, if we take into account that we’ve been closing almost 10 churches a year (more than 100 a decade) since the late 60s, and if we realize just how difficult it is to change de-vitalizing behaviors that have developed over decades, we begin to realize that $1 million is not even close to the real cost. If we are going to get real about this, everyone is going to have to dig deep, not just TEC, but dioceses and congregations as well.

Even we had all the financial support we might want, congregational revitalization still would be a complex and difficult task. Real congregational vitalization requires so much more than mere funding. It requires but an opening of blind eyes, a softening of hardened hearts, and a strengthening of will.

As one who has both planted churches and consulted with congregations and dioceses about turning around de-vitalizing congregation, I can tell you that congregational revitalization is a much more difficult. Church planting is hard work. But it’s hard work in the same way that giving birth is hard work. Congregational revitalization is more like raising the undead.

Real congregational revitalization requires: (1) opening our eyes to the fact that we are dead, (2) opening our hearts to a desire for new life, and (3) strengthening our will to believe hear, believe, and act upon the ways that God is calling us to change if we are to experience resurrection God is holding in store for us.

The first requirement may be the hardest of all. After all, no church wants know that it is dead. And like any human organization, churches can keep themselves from seeing the signs of their decline for a long time. Established churches have a lot of inertia behind them: built-and-paid-for building, families that have known each other forever, settled ways of doing things. It wasn’t a typo earlier when I compared de-vitalized churches to the undead. Like Zombie Churches, they can shuffle along for years after their brains and hearts have died. And if a de-vitalized church has an endowment from which to feed, they can keep shuffling along for decades.

Like the proverbial frog in the proverbial pot on the proverbial stove, death is so slow in coming that congregations often fail to notice the damage being done to their life processes until it’s almost to late to reverse the damage. The de-vitalizing behaviors develop so gradually and have been practiced for so long, that they seem normal. It’s a real bind. If you could catch those de-vitalizing behaviors before they become so ingrained and habitual, the behaviors themselves would be easy to modify. Except the leaders and congregation seldom notice until much later, when a minor course correction won’t work any more, and more drastic measures are required.

Sadly, the community around a de-vitalizing parish usually knows the church is dying long before the congregation comes to terms with it themselves. Often they have stopped paying attention to their context long ago, staying inside their buildings in both the literal and the figurative senses. And the community around them is returning the favor. They are that old Monty Python skit, “The Late Parrot,” in which the customer insists the bird the shopkeeper is trying to sell is dead, but the shopkeeper keeps insisting, “No ee’s not. Just napping.” A lot of de-vitalizing parishes have been trying to sell our communities dead parrots for years without even realizing it.

As Steve Pankey rightly points out, not every congregation can (or wants) to be saved. Some would rather die than change. Some will simply need to be convinced by their dioceses that it is time to turn off the life support, pastorally companioned into death, and given a decent burial, with a memorial that remembers when they were vital, growing, and communicating the Good News of resurrection life. But there are others that show signs of potential for new life: who admit that they are dead and who are willing to be resurrected. It is in these congregations that we must invest, so that they might rediscover the vision, the love, the energy, and the imagination to find new ways of doing – but more importantly being – Church and of sharing the Good News of Jesus Christ in a world of rapid change and increasing uncertainty.

Sources include:

  • George Barna. (1993). Turn-Around Churches: How to Overcome Barriers to Growth and Bring New Life to an Established Church. Ventura, CA: Regal.
  • Kirk Hadaway, TEC Director of Research.
  • Gary McIntosh(December, 1990). When to Close a Church, in The McIntosh Church Growth Network Newsletter (2:12).
  • Steve Pankey, from his blog, “Draughting Theology
  • Susan Brown Snook, from her forthcoming book, “God gave the growth.”

Previous Post: D005 Planting Churches – “14 Church Planting Facts”

Next Post: D019 – Digital Evangelism – “Church Marketing Sucks”


3 thoughts on “#EpiscopalResurrection #GC78 – Rez D009: Revitalize Congregations – Death Before Resurrection

  1. The TEC answer is always: Staff position, money allocated, etc. It is probable too late to restore catholic Christianity with a liturgy which served well for several hundred years before someone decided that Folk, Clown, Band Masses were just what was needed (along with the appointed staff, funding and of course coercion that all MUST do it the new way. When that didn’t work, we tried “inclusivity”…well, we all know how well that has performed. More gays, transvestites, trans genders, etc. will be the new fix. Good luck with that! Perhaps the Gospel might be given a second chance.

    • Fred, It sounds as though you have judged those of us in Episcopal Resurrection without really learning what we are about. It makes me wonder whether you have actually read my entire series on Episcopal Resurrection or the other articles on my site, or if you have read any of the information on the Episcopal Resurrection website or any of the articles written by its supporters. Because if you had, I don’t see how you could make that snarky remark about how we might want to give the Gospel a “second chance.” I am a church planter. So is Susan Brown Snook. So is Frank Logue. So are many of the people supporting this movement. We are not in this because we think that this or that liturgy is the answer, but because we want to bring the Good News of Jesus Christ to the world, so that the love of Christ might transform the world and all who live in it. Yes, we do want inclusivity, would you deny to any group the opportunity to experience the Gospel and the love of Christ. It sounds like you and I disagree on the full inclusion of LGBT people in the Church. I will say only two things about that from my own point of view. First, my position for full inclusion is fully grounded in Scripture (search for “The Bible and Same-Sex Relations” on my website). And second, for me our arguments over this issue in many ways are a distraction from sharing the Gospel. It’s not my job to decide who’s in and who’s out, it’s not my job to change peoples’ hearts. For my part, I’m going to share the Gospel and introduce people to Jesus Christ, and leave the transformation of people in God’s hands.

  2. Pingback: #EpiscopalResurrection: Rez 4 (Digital Evangelism) | Paradoxical Thoughts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s